Take the honest core first. Whatever happened at Tunguska was recorded by
instruments, not just witnesses: seismographs across Eurasia,
barographs as far as London that caught the pressure wave lapping the planet, and —
nineteen years later — Leonid Kulik's expeditions, which mapped ~2,150 km² of
trees felled radially outward from a centre where the forest still stood, scorched
and upright. That last detail is the signature: the blast came from above.
So put a rock in the sky and do the arithmetic. A sphere of diameter $D$ and density
$\rho$ arriving at cosmic velocity $v$ carries
$$E \;=\; \tfrac{1}{2}\,m v^{2}\,,\qquad m=\tfrac{\pi}{6}\,\rho\,D^{3}$$
Drop in an ordinary stony asteroid, $D=60$ m, $\rho=3000$ kg/m³, at
$v=15$ km/s: $E \approx 3.8\times10^{16}$ J — about 9 megatons of
TNT, six hundred Hiroshimas, squarely inside the modern 3–15 Mt estimate
for Tunguska. Cube-root blast scaling anchored on the observation puts the tree-fall
ring near 26 km — an area of ~2,200 km², matching Kulik's map. And because
a stony body this size shatters and vaporizes ~8 km up, the model
predicts the two facts that spawned every conspiracy: no crater, no
fragments.
This stopped being a thought experiment on February 15, 2013, when a 19-metre sibling
detonated over Chelyabinsk on a hundred dashcams — 0.5 Mt, windows down across a
city, no crater, same physics, filmed. Press the preset and compare.